sábado, 2 de febrero de 2013

Scientific production spilt in symposiums of cardiovascular nursing in Argentina


2008 World Congress of Cardiology - Poster Presentations


J. Boggiano, R. Miret. Interamerican Research Group of Nursing and Health

Objective: To analyze the scientific production spilt in symposiums of cardiovascular nursing in Argentina from May, 2002 up to June, 2007; determining the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the articles.

Material and method: A bibliometric, descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective analysis was conducted for a 5-year period (2002–2007). The population object of study they were all the articles published in the simposios of cardiovascular nursing in Argentina. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to study productivity and collaboration and to conduct an analysis on the subject, respectively. A previously agreed upon and standardised manual revision was carried out as a technique for data retrieval. Descriptive statistics and Statistical Inference indexes (Chi square and simple linear regression analysis) were used for quantitative analysis. The data were processed using the SPSS 10.0 statistical package

Results: The average number of articles published per issue was 9.2 (SD: 1.02), with a tendency towards an increase 37% of authors were from the hospital setting. The autonomous region with the highest production output was Buenos Aires city (44.6%). 53.6% of the articles were undersigned by one single author. The overall collaboration rate was 2.29, which steadily increased over the five years of study. The area of knowledge most widely written about was interventional cardiology of Nursing (49.4%); by another hand, 12 Circulation Vol 117, No 19 May 13, 2008 a 27.2% were research articles (this articles have increased significantly over the period under study). 


Conclusions: the increase in the number of articles, specially of research, as well as in the increase of the index of collaboration, reveals that the quality of the analyzed articles is good, with an steady improvement over the 5 years since it was first released in the market. On the other hand, there is still a rather high percentage of papers undersigned by one single author, which, in a way, appears to indicate a rather artesian scientific practice.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario